Category Archives: News and politics

Ottawa Bus Crash


Monday morning a double-decker city transit bus collided with a passenger train in Ottawa.  Six killed and about 30 injured in one of those horrific things that happen in the world, in this case a little too close to home.  We’re going to overlook the tragedy for the time being and focus on what were the potential contributing factors as the Transportation Safety Board (TSB) sifts through several months worth of investigation.  By the way, the TSB is very thorough:  If there is a golden nugget, they’ll find it.

The OCTranspo bus, here, weighs in at 52,911 pounds, about 26 tons.  A passenger train weighs in around 60 tons per car, with the engine weighing around 268,800 pounds, or 134 tons.  Easy math, the bus will lose.  So will people walking on the tracks, or a car, or a tractor trailer full of steel beams.  The train is bigger, weighs more and can’t stop nearly as well as any bus, truck, snowmobile, ATV, hiker, moose, or scooter puke on a Vespa listening to Juice Newton bootlegs on his iPod with the volume up at 11. 

Train versus any thing usually ends poorly for the other thing.

A major contributing factor in Ottawa is what is called a grade crossing or a level crossing.  There are more than 40,000 of them in Canada, most of the white cross-buck warning, without lights, bells or barricades.  The vast majority are rural, off the beaten path and the locals know enough to stop, look and listen.  In urban areas, we get the full lights, bells and barricades treatment to keep us from being complete idiots.  Even then, there are idiots out there that this link gives you enough examples of just how dumb humans can be.

The fix is to keep trains away from vehicles.  Underpasses or overpasses cost money, but they work well at keeping the two apart.  High speed rail, by definition has no, or almost no level crossings to keep a 300 kilometer per hour passenger train away from everyone else.  They almost always have their own dedicated tracks to keep them away from other trains too, the engineering of complete separation ensuring more potential for safety.  Not safety as an absolute, but the potential for safety.  Barcelona is an example of the human overriding the potential for safety in high-speed rail accidents. 

Canada flirted with high-speed rail in the mid-60’s with the CN Turbo Train.  On its maiden trip, the Turbo clobbered truck at a level crossing near Kingston, ON, essentially pulling the plug on high-speed rail in Canada.  The costs were prohibitive to give the Turbo Train a dedicated, safe, right of way in the Quebec City-Windsor corridor.  Move the calendar to 2013 and the problem is still with us.  Land, bridges, overpasses, underpasses and infrastructure all cost a lot of money for very little visible return, except for that nebulous concept of safety.

Like pilots, train engineers and bus drivers, those people are always first at the accident and have a vested interest in things being as safe as we can make them.

The cheapest and fastest fix today is to legislate that any vehicle that carries more than 10 people or weighs more than 10 tons must come to a full stop at any railroad crossing, lights or not and only proceed when the way is clear.  It’s a simple, cheap fix the Provincial and Federal governments can put in place in a dozen phone calls, some emails and a couple of weeks work. 

Which is why it won’t be done.  Stop.  Look.  Listen.

Twelve Years Later


A dozen years after 9/11 and it is still weird seeing that date on the calendar.  There is a smaller psychic wobble now as we’ve moved on from 2001, not really healed, but at least being able to cope with how we feel about things.

Like most, we remember where we were when it happened, in our case on a flight to San Francisco from Ottawa, to start building out some Hands-On Labs for that little company called Microsoft.  The flight got as far as Lake Ontario, when it was told to turn around, go back to YOW, land, get the pax off and shut it down to await further instructions.  That’s all the flight crew knew.  I called home to a tearful spouse who told me the rest of the story:  A plane had crashed into the WTC in New York.  I passed that data to the other passengers and the flight attendant nearby, who passed it on to the crew.

Landing and disembarking, we were confronted with 3,000 deadly quiet others in the Ottawa Airport, staring open-mouthed at the TV screens, not making a sound, not comprehending what they were seeing as the second plane had just punched a hole in our collective innocence.  I got the bags and met Marylou at the curb.  We hustled home and parked on the sofa for the next two days, unbelieving, uncomprehending and confused.

To this day those scenes are burned into our minds as they should be.  They caused a ripple of hurt, anger and confusion as there was no valid reason for this to happen to us.  Or so we thought. 

We haven’t fixed any of it.  Some would say that the military-industrial-security complex that suddenly popped up made sure we would never feel safe again.  A fearful populace is a compliant populace who will pay for and demand every possible protection and agree to every possible intrusion on our privacy as long as the government promises to never let that happen again.  As long as we didn’t have to see a tower turn into powder and fall to the ground, we bent over.

A dozen years on now, we should revisit how we reacted and what has been done in our name to ‘protect’ us from that hurt. I’m not saying it was all good, nor all bad:  Like all humans making decisions on the fly we may have made mistakes that we should go back and look at again.

And at the same time, remember those who lost so much on September 11, 2001.

Syria and Sarin


In this story the Syrian government has agreed to let some UN folks in to investigate the possibility of the armed forces using nerve gas to quell protests in a suburb of Damascus.  How nice of them.

The bones of story, if you haven’t followed it (and many have not) is that the Syrian Army of Bashar Assad gassed people with Sarin, killing either a dozen, several dozen or thousands, depending on what source you use.  Medecine Sans Frontieres  (Doctors Without Borders) has the smallest axe to grind in the region and have put the number around 355 deaths and 3,600 with symptoms of exposure to a nerve agent.  We’re inclined to go with their count as the closest to reality.

The UN has finally got weapons inspectors on the ground, looking at what evidence they can, aside from testimony of hundreds of eyewitnesses.  The UN folks have their hands tied however, they have to stay within the tight proscription of their mandate.  Find evidence of the munitions and tie that to the Syrian Government.  Unless they find an unexploded warhead, loaded with Sarin, with a shipping tag signed “Bobby Assad, Prop. Syria” with a photo of Assad and a copy of last week’s Daily Worker stuffed inside, like the classic Lee Harvey Oswald shot, that won’t be good enough to pass the nut of the UN.  They’ll come back with a suitably couched diplomatically-weasel-worded ‘Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t’

Here’s the problem.  Assuming the Syrian Government did fire off Sarin-loaded munitions and had them successfully detonate, gassing 350 or so ‘rebels’, what the hell can the UN do about it? 

The fast answer is absolutely nothing.  Even if the UN finds video of Bashar Assad loading the munitions himself, the UN can do absolutely nothing except complain.  They can’t even bring a motion of censure in front of the General Assembly because Russia and China, both members of the Security Council, have vetoes and have already promised to use them if the UN Weapons Inspectors find anything.

Why?  First off is money.  Russia sells a lot of military gear to Syria.  China sells the rest to them.  Secondly is money.  China needs oil.  Syria has oil.  Third, it will piss off the Americans, which is a sport in China and Russia.  They both know that American can’t do anything about Syria without incurring the wrath of the rest of the Middle East.  Fourth, they know the UN is nothing more than a Toyota Land Cruiser full of mentally constipated bureaucrats who can’t decide to take a dump without fifteen nations being involved in negotiations for the next six months, then a resolution to take a dump put before the Security Council, then the General Assembly. 

Then the UN would have to undertake a study of the paperwork involved, likely meeting in Berne, Delhi, Sao Paolo and Auckland to determine if they should wipe from the front to the back, or back to the front, with a certain kind of paper, or just a page from a newspaper. But which newspaper?  Is it Eco-friendly newsprint (+20% post-consumer recycled) with low-VOC inks from vegetable and sustainable sources?  Which hand?

So who’s left to do something?  The US can’t.  If they so much as take out an ad calling on the UN to do something, every nation in the Middle East will claim the US is but a puppet of Israel.  If Israel so much as coughs deeply, then the Jews are trying to take over Palestine and the rest of the Arab world with their nuclear warmongery trying to wipe the Arab nations off their rightful inheritance of all those maps coordinates that don’t actually get printed on Arab maps, as Israel doesn’t actually exist. 

The EU that counts (Britain, France and Germany) dare not so much as clear their throats for fear they get asked to actually cowboy up and do something.  The UK conceivably could, but knows it opens a can of pan-Arab whoopass.  It would start with bombings in London wrapped up with a side order of Palestine in 1947,  Besides, the UK Parliament said “Thanks, no”.  France couldn’t organize a two car funeral procession without endless protesting from the polar extremes of their five-dimensional political spectrum from the punctuation-phobic Social Democrats to the four guys in Lyon who can actually name the President and think his wife is a babe 

Germany is too busy trying keep the Greek, Italian, Hungarian and Spanish parts of the EU from being sold at a garage sale next week in Bonn.  Turkey, more or less next door, isn’t interested.  They’ve got enough refugees from Syria running across the border already.  Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Saudi, Jordan, or anyone else in neighbourhood with more than two shotguns and a guy in a camo vest won’t touch it.  They all know it’s a zero-win proposition and if they do step up to knock Assad down, then someone will look a little too closely at how they have kept their own house in order.

That leaves Chad, Burkina Faso, Bermuda, Afghanistan, Iceland and, wait for it, Canada.  Unfortunately out airplane is up on cinder blocks right now.  The batteries for the starter are back ordered at Canadian Tire and nobody has jumper cables.  Oh, and our helicopters fall out of the sky if you try to make them fly against their will.

Short form?  Assad has gotten away with it.  Nobody is going to do anything.  Nobody can do anything about it. 

Been a while: Today’s Outrage


It has been a while, what with life intruding, but we’re back at it, hopefully on a more regular basis.  Thank you for your patience.

First off, Today’s Outrage:  An anonymous person in Newcastle, Ontario decided it would be acceptable to drop off a letter at a house.  The story is that the letter describes the noises the recipient’s grandson makes are “noise polluting whailing (sic)” scared the author’s “normal children”.  A reasonable gripe, kids are loud. 

The line was crossed at this point: “he is a hindrance to everyone and will always be that” and “do the right thing and move or euthanize him”  Said kid, is 13 years old and autistic, which the anonymous author recognizes up front in the first ‘graph. 

Now, aside from being a gutless birth canal, the anonymous author has managed to get a lot of righteous international support for the family of the child.  This kind of behaviour is never acceptable, under any of the tests of reasonableness, however, the local Durham region cops, after conferring with the local Crown Attorney, has decided that the test of “hate crime” has not been met.  Hateful, certainly, extraordinarily and very deliberately cruel, of course, but not exactly a ‘hate crime’. 

To illustrate a different reaction to excessive noise, we give you our own circumstance.  Last week some lads were delivering flyers in our modest neighbourhood.  They rolled the car up, bounced out and went door to door, dropping flyers.  Except they left the radio on, at a very loud level.  This we can tolerate for the couple of three minutes it takes until they move on, an annoyance, but not really an issue.

Except the lyrics of the particular song, which was very easily heard inside our house, started with “I’m gonna fuck me some niggah bitches right up the ass…” and went down hill from there.  Not exactly my taste in musical expression and I would suspect not exactly the most appropriate lyrics for anywhere outside of an after-hours club.

I took a few seconds to pull on some shoes and went outside.  Hailing down the driver of the vehicle, very calmly and very firmly said that, “I appreciate your taste in music, but please, I don’t need to hear it inside my house.  Could you please turn it down?”  The fellow reacted quizzically and asked if it was too loud?  I said it was and the lyrics weren’t really appropriate.  He very quickly turned it off and apologized.  I said thanks and that was it.  No threats, no offers to euthanize, violate, or chop up into small pieces and feed to the fishes.  Just a simple transaction of asking for a little discretion, courtesy and mutual respect from both sides.

Now back to this gutless birth canal in Newcastle.  If she had tried on several occasions to let her feelings about the autistic kid be known, or at least had tried to open a dialogue with the family, to understand the why or wherefore of the situation, then that should have been the end of it.  Perhaps a few hurt feelings, or a bit of a miffed attitude, certainly, but not this explosion of needless cruelty that has now gone very public and very viral. 

We know that someone, somewhere will find out who wrote this letter and delivered it, then someone else will decide that something equally as vile is a fair response, escalating until the Fully Stupid line is crossed involving pets, random damage and violence. 

It doesn’t have to be that way.  Ideally the author will approach the family, apologize, then the family will let us know that everything is now cool and there is no need to take it any further.  Equally hatful trolls will chill out and a very ugly scene will be averted.  Ideally.

Except that what we’re talking about is grownups behaving like grownups, taking responsibilities for their own actions and ensuring that things don’t escalate into Fully Stupid. 

We can only hope  

 

 

Boston


We’ve held off on writing about Boston for a reason.  The situation was so fluid and unpredictable that anything we wrote would be null and void a half-hour later.  Now that things have resolved we can comment with some certainty of reflection.

First off, the bombings have nothing to do with ObamaCare, Gun Control, Foreign Policy towards Syria, drilling for oil in Alaska or Obama’s birth certificate.  If the right wing nuts would be so kind as to shut the front door, we can go about our analysis with a semblance of intellectual rigour.

What we’re probably looking at are two disaffected young men with a wobbly set of beliefs.  There could be some religious overtones there, but nothing along the lines of Al-Qaeda jihadist cement heads that we know about yet.  Disaffected and unconnected to their society, yes, very much so, but we will find out more as the investigation progresses as to the motivations involved.

The technology involved in the bombings were crude, home made and very effective at doing exactly what these guys wanted to do: Spread panic and terror.  The objective was to maim and kill as many as possible, but without access to legit explosives and detonators, they resorted to some basement-built improvised explosive devices that worked fine, thank you very much.

The bigger questions, still unanswered, are why and who else?

Was there some mentorship, leadership or technical assistance from elsewhere to bring these two to a Monday afternoon last week?

Understandably the police, FBI and HomeBoy Security are not being particularly forthcoming with the information.  They should keep their collective pie-holes shut until they come up with answers that pass a rudimentary logic test.  We will find out more as this unwraps. 

Where this all goes to hell is with our media.  They’ve got a news cycle to fill and if you haven’t got anything to say, then they will speculate and surmise and guess, then bring in the ‘experts’ to add their noise to the news hour.  Oh and make sure you put a four-second clip of two guys walking around, on permanent repeat for at least a dozen hours along with the graphic crawl, along with the spinning animated ‘bug’ in the bottom right-hand corner of the screen. 

Shampoo, rinse, repeat, endlessly, until we turn off the television.

Get your North Korea Program Here!


Back in July 2006 we published the Official Nuclear War Program for the Sea of Japan, if only so we could keep the players straight.  It hasn’t changed much.  The reason we published it on RoadDave was it is important to know the players, with any sport and planet-destroying nuclear war is certainly a sport.  Perhaps one with more importance than the NCAA Finals.  So here’s the players and a description of the field:

China:  Has missiles, has nukes, has a big army that can kick ass and take names and submarines prowling the Sea of Japan.  Most of their stuff is pointed at Taiwan.

Taiwan:  Has mostly ground to air and anti-ship missiles along with a decent air force to protect it from invasion by China.  The US has been the purveyor of fine weaponry of choice to Taiwan since 1948, so they have a lot of the good stuff.  They don’t have nukes, but they do have submarines.

South Korea:  Some of their own, but mostly US provided missiles for self-defense and a lot of effective artillery all aimed at North Korea.  There is a sizable US military presence in South Korea, continuing the ‘police action’ along the 38th parallel with the South Korean army that ain’t too shabby.  South Korea doesn’t have nukes, but there are couple of nuclear power reactors at Ulsan.  South Korea also has submarines.

Russia:  Has missiles, mostly aimed at China as well as an army that can kick ass and take names.  Russia has nukes and submarines but we don’t talk about that.

Japan:  Has missiles, but mostly shorter range air defense or anti-shipping missiles.  They do have a 240,000 person self-defense force that has the A-List US gear.  There are nuclear power reactors in Japan, but no nuclear weapons.  Japan has submarines.

North Korea has missiles that work well enough.  You don’t have to be terrifically accurate with nukes.  North Korea has a massive standing army, with hundreds of artillery pieces pointed at South Korea.  North Korea also has submarines.

United States:  Has missiles that can deliver rounds into Kim Jong-un’s second floor bathroom window in Pyongyang from Aegis guided missile cruisers stationed in the Sea of Japan.  The US has nuclear-powered submarines, with or without nukes, in the area.  Rule of Thumb?  If there’s an aircraft carrier, there is a battle group with it and CVN-74 (John C. Stennis) is at Changi Naval Base, Singapore while CVN-73 (George Washington) is at Yokosuka, a bit south of Yokohama, Japan.

Here’s the real danger, aside from all these people being armed.  The Sea of Japan is not that big.  You’ve got seven nations rolling around in an area of 997,980 square kilometers.  By contrast, Lake Superior is 82,100 square kilometers and the Pacific Ocean is 165,200,000 square kilometers to put some perspective on it.  Seven nations, rolling around with ships, submarines and aircraft, all with itchy trigger fingers, looking to get something going.

With that much gear bouncing around out there, the potential for a simple dumb accident is very high.  Will a submarine driver for any of the interested parties make a mistake and bump into someone else’s submarine?  Would the various governments manipulate that into a “provocative, unwarranted attack on a sovereign nation in the free and open sea.”?

Would that be enough justification to set off North Korea?  China is twitchy at the best of times.  The US is wound a little tight right now.  North Korea might go off just so Kim Jong-un can say he’s not a Daddy’s Boy.  Taiwan has their colour-code terror-threat Pez-dispenser pinned on red since 1948. 

It won’t take much.

Mason Baveux and the NHL Strike


You know he wanted to.

Thanks for the bloggery chance again lad to finish off the commentatin on the NHL strike.  The Owners voted to settle up and the Players voted to settle up this week too, so’s they goin to Trainin Camp startin tomorrow, games firin up on Jan 19th with a 48 game season, then playoffs until the friggin end of June if they go seven for the Cup.

I’m a two minds here.  The owners are a bunch of greedy snots.  The players aren’t much better, except they can always argue that their career could end every time they lace up and hit the ice, leavin the paydays behind right snappy.  I suppose you could say I’m semi-sidin with the players, more onside than offside, but I’m callin offside on the owners. 

The owners know they ain’t nobody going to pay $200 a seat to watch them examine a balance sheet or shake hands with a City Counsellor in their private box with the deluxe catering and rivers of booze.

Which brings me back to the whole economicals of hockey.  If you’re a hockey fan and want to go see the Leafs (and whatever they prop up behind the bench as coach now that Burke’s been sent down) there’s a bit of an investment you’ve got to make.

First off, the Leafs suck this year.  Odds are the new coach is as likely to be a terrarium on wheels that they’ll roll behind the bench, wheelin it back and forth each period.  Inside’ll be a turtle or a spotted lizard who’ll do as good a job as anything coachin this collection of players they got.  If the lizard sticks out his tongue, change lines.  If he sits under the heatlamp in the third period, pull the goalie.  Coachin done.  Feed him some raw meat, or likely just a leftover hot dog from a private box.

What I mean of investment, is more in the financial side.  Gettin to the game is $50 for parking.  Seats are $100 at least so you can see the ice in the near distance.  Beer is $14, program is $10 and they’ve got a special on hot dogs.  Their $2 hot dog is now $12.  Or to add up the numbers, if you were inclined to take a family of four to a game, you’re in the ditch about $600 before the players hit the ice and you mumble the words to O Canada. 

For your 6 large you get packed into a sweatbox, surrounded by yahoos, drunkards and truckers with Tourette’s who insist that standing up in front of your kids and swearing is “good for team spirit” up until they puke on the youngest, or pass out face first into a urinal between periods in a Men’s room that smells worse than a latrine trench at the dialysis sleep over camp for the Incontinent. 

Then when she’s all over and the Leafs have lost again, you got a 2 hour wait to get out of the parking and start home in a car that smells like piss, beer, sweat and puke.  And you family.

Frankly, you’re better off to stay home and watch the game on TV, investin the $600 in upfront payments to some Nigerian minister who’s get $10 million of ill-gotten gains he wants to launder through your chequing account. 

I spose this is my way of sayin’ eff this season, I’m not goin to any games.  The NHL can go to hell, get cancer of the eyes, fall down a flight of stairs, break a hip and die in a fire for the 2013 season.  I’m not givin Bettman my money. 

You can call me back in September and maybe I’ll think about it, but right now, to hell with em.  I’ll watch indoor soccer, or stare at the aquarium channel for four hours on game night.

Newtown II


We’re  not a fan of stirring up stuff but with the previous post Newtown, we think we hit a nerve.  Fair enough we hit a nerve and by way of acknowledgement, we’ve published the responses as they stand.  Not agreeing is perfectly acceptable behaviour in our books as well as vociferously backing up your argument with as many facts as is reasonable.  Being able to dish it out, means being able to take it and we accept that as part of genteel discourse.

Now, is America the problem?  By our judgement, yes and here come some facts that we left out of the published version for editorial reasons and we’ll take that criticism as given.

Population adjusted per 1,000 citizens, the Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice systems during 1998 to 2000, (the most recent figures readily available) lists Murders with firearms per capita, by country thusly:

#1 South Africa – 0.719782 per 1000 people

#2 Columbia – 0.509801 per 1000 people

#3 Thailand – 0.312092 per 1000 people…

Skipping Zimbabwe, Mexico and Belarus here..

#7 Costa Rica – 0.0313745 per 1000 people

#8 United States – 0.0279271 per 1000 people

#9 Uruguay – 0.0245902 per 1000 people

Skipping a bunch more…

#19 Switzerland – 0.00596718 per 1000 people

#20 Canada – 0.050297 per 1000 people

#21 Germany – 0.00465844 per 1000 people.

Our source is here if you want to look it up and feel free to.  We don’t mind being fact-checked.  We encourage it.

Some other facts. Number of guns per capita by country, 2007

#1 United States – 88.8 per 100 residents

#2 Serbia – 58.2 per 100 residents

#3 Yemen – 54.8 per 100 residents

#4 Switzerland – 45.7 per 100 residents

#5 Cyprus – 36.4 per 100 residents…

Skipping a few here…

#13 Canada – 30.8 per 100 residents

#14 Austria – 30.4 per 100 residents

#15 Germany – 30.3 per 100 residents

Interesting how Switzerland has the 4th highest number of firearms per 100 people and yet ranks only 19th in Murders with firearms.  Switzerland has mandatory military service and citizens who serve are expected to keep their weapons and ammunition at home, ready to go on two hours’ notice, which explains why they have such a high ranking in number of guns, but not their low ranking in the number of murders with firearms.  It proves that sensible, secure, trained gun ownership is not the issue.

As for rampant stereotyping, we’ll buy some of the critique, but hear us out.  It is no more stereotypical than saying the Swiss are neat and fiscally prudent, Italians passionate, or that all Scottish cuisine is based on a drunken dare at a slaughterhouse.  We’ll partially apologize and try to do better going forward.

Exceptions don’t prove the rule and the millions of sensible, safe, concerned and sane gun owners are not all ready to run amok at the slightest provocation.  If you’re interpreting our remarks that way, give you head a shake and go read our post again.     

Crazies exist, which is why we noted Anders Brevik from Norway, as a crazy, who in possibly the best, most progressive health care system in the world, was not identified beforehand as a loon.  Health care can’t do that job, no matter where.  If we tripled American mental health spending tomorrow, we still can’t identify individuals who are likely to flip out and kill people.  Health care is not the issue.  

It was and is American media that stuffed a microphone in the face of the kids who survived the shooting and had the unadulterated gall to ask a child what they felt and heard during the shooting, parental permission or not.  This link from twitchy.com lists several of the comments from others regarding the media vultures who have wrapped themselves around this story.  Read some of the links and be embarrassed for your country rewarding that kind of corporate media behaviour.  Bloodthirsty and sensationalistic are the terms that come to mind. 

This doesn’t mean the UK, or Canadian media are any less culpable in our own back yards, or somehow ‘better’:  It means the US media as a whole needs to stop and think a moment or two and ask the hard question:  Is this the right thing to do, now, or can it wait?  We’d love to hear their argument as why they didn’t and we bet it comes down to Freedom of the Press as the reason and a Competitive Marketplace as the excuse. 

Using that same logic we expect to soon see Bill O’Reilly violating a giraffe, live, because Piers Morgan molested a mule and pulled a 12 share last night that beat Fox with a measly 4 share with O’Reilly talking to a vending machine about foreign policy.  “Dammit Bill, we need that 12 share to make our numbers for the quarter!”

To close the loop, as others have noted, it is the need for a discussion about National US Firearms laws to end the knobby melange of contradictory laws and standards that have mutated across the US, pushed and pulled by lobby groups and think tanks with more disparate agendas that Carter has little pills.

We’ve stood on the firearm platform before.  We’ve got no issue with firearm weapons more than 18 inches long, with a mag that holds no more than 8 rounds (or so) and can fire semi-auto.  Anything else you want, apply, wait for the background check and probably the firm, but polite ‘no’ from the authorities.  We are in favour of extensive, mandatory training of anyone who wants to have a firearm weapon so they can operate them in a prudent, safe and responsible manner.  Military re-enactors?  Apply, your reason is good enough (to us anyways) assuming you pass the background check and you have passed a firearms safety course.  Do expect to be audited once in a while, but not onerously so.   

We’ve also promulgated a societal and legal change using something called a “Double Double” meaning. committing a crime with a firearm weapon doubles the sentence.  Discharging the firearm doubles it again. No time off for good behaviour or parole.  You serve the full sentence.  The concept being to discourage the criminal use of firearm weapons as harshly as possible.  It will take a generation to get that to sink in, much like it has taken a generation to curtail cigarette smoking, drinking and driving, having a martini to cure morning sickness or using seatbelts in your car.  It is time consuming and is not an instant fix.

Which is what all the nattering is really about.  Everyone wants an instant fix to prevent a copycat, or another loon from going off and finding the readily available tools, cheap-jack rationale and attendant media coverage to slaughter innocent people.  Most have glommed onto “Gun Control” as the Instant Fix, but that’s not the whole story or even half of the fix. 

Where the blame lies is in the inability of America to have a peaceable, dignified, sane, learned, fact-based discussion about how they want the citizens of their country to behave with each other.  There is too much sensationalism, knee-jerk reactions and political axe-grinding in the media to have anything but sensationalism, knee-jerk reactions and political axe-grinding by their citizens.  It has to stop and you have to fix it.

Goddammit, you’re Americans, you know better, you’re smarter than most and you have the will to take back your own media from the cretins.  Open a dialogue, in all directions, come to a consensus, make the decisions and get on with life where you aren’t being manipulated every 12 seconds by the circus you call a media telling you what you think and how to react.  Ignore the political manipulations from the Right and the Left and make up your own minds. 

Get this fixed.  You deserve better.

Newtown


Unless you’ve been on a four-day Jack Daniels’ bender you have heard and seen the horror of the the Newtown, CT. killings at Sandy Hook Elementary School. 

After the first four hours, the various media outlets shifted into their accustomed role of speculation, as there were no hard, actual facts to report.  The usual commentators were dragged up, psychologists, security specialists, gun control advocates, PTSD counsellors and of course, loose cannons, sandwich-short-of-a-picnic social commentators and the monomaniacal who won’t change their mind and won’t change the subject.  I think I recall some halfwit on Fox blaming the Palestinians for the shooting, and it was Obama’s fault because he wouldn’t let Israel build a 40 foot wall around the Arab homelands.  That’s when I turned off the TV. 

Facts, those slippery things, are slowly coming out, as they should with some care for the accuracy.  We’re going to add a few of our own facts to the hopper, leavened with rational opinion.

Gun Laws as they currently stand had very little to do with the incident.  The weapons were legal as of today and the ammunition was also legal.  The killer wasn’t using anything full-auto or cut down to hide it.  Connecticut has some of the stronger gun licensing laws in the US. 

Health Care or ObamaCare has nothing whatsoever to do with the shootings.  Norway, with a very good cradle to grave healthcare system produced Anders Brevik, who calmly executed 77 people in July 2011.  Norway’s health system didn’t spot the looney.  No health care system, however funded, can spot the looney, unless we revert to a Stasi-era system of everyone being secret informers for the government.

Government Funding of Education:  Please, go away, your stupidity is making my eyes hurt.  The same for those who believe that the Fiscal Cliff debate, Obama’s re-election, Two-party politics, or stalemates in the Congress and Senate have anything to do with this.  Go away, shut the F up and go back to sucking your thumb until you join the real world, you pseudo-intellectual orifices. 

Here’s where the problem lies.  You ready?  It will hurt.

Instant access of firearm weapons of all types, legal, illegal, auto, semi-auto and the willingness to use them on a moments’ notice to settle disputes. 

There’s the real points, the real points that are not being talked about.

The issue is the American societal fixation on having firearm weapons readily to hand to “defend” themselves.  It is ingrained by decades of media rationalizations and societal conditioning that the ONLY way to settle a problem is to kill the other party. 

Even after the Aurora, Colorado theatre shooting, some commentators very directly defended the right to bear arms (and by extension, concealed carry) as a way to have stopped James Eagan Holmes from killing 12 people at a screening of The Dark Knight Rises.  If only the other people in the theatre had responded with a volley…

Using that logic, if the staff at every school in America were issued or allowed to carry firearm weapons, then incidents like this would never happen again. 

A second factoid, making the rounds of Facebook. 

Last year handguns killed:  48 people in Japan, 8 in the UK, 34 in Switzerland, 52 in Canada, 58 in Israel, 21 in Sweden, 42 in Germany,

and 10,728 in the US.

The problem is not guns, laws, health care, politics, fiscal cliffs, unemployment, drugs or bad parenting. 

The problem is America.

  

Calling the US Big E


Now that Superstorm Sandy has blown itself out, we can get down to calling the US election. 

In this corner, Willard Romney.  Republican-esque, trying to conjure the spirit of Ronnie Regan and failing miserably.  He’s saddled by a party that is in self-flagellation mode, split between Tea Party loons and those who believe that owning poor people is The American Way.  Let us not forget the short-bus candidates who insist that uteruses (uteri?) know the difference between rape, incest, wanted and unwanted pregnancies, as every egg is sacred, but don’t ever consider legislating the spilling of seed without procreation. 

In that corner is Barack Obama, who is, at best, Carter-esqe and not in a good way.  He presided over the biggest economic meltdowns of all time, not all of it his doing, but he’s still the guy in the Big Chair.  The Democrats in-fight like cats in a burlap bag over some of the most picayune minutiae of an unsustainable platform cobbled together by people educated beyond their intelligence at taxpayer expense.

So who wins on Tuesday?  Polls tell us it is a dead-heat.  Obama’s very presidential behaviour post-Sandy probably gave a good dozen pollsters what could be politely described as conniption fits, as he came across well.  Now it’s down to who can get out the vote. 

Republicans can’t or won’t do the grunt work needed on Tuesday as it might involve a Negro being in their car, or having their illegal-alien groundskeeper take time from pruning the azaleas to drive them to a polling station.  This is assuming they live in a state where they haven’t managed to pass voter ID laws that make the old, vicious, Jim Crow statutes look like “Go Back Two Spaces” from a Snakes and Ladders game.

Democrats meanwhile will argue that only electric cars should be used to ferry eligible voters to a poll, while a cadre of Young Democrats tries to get a trending-Twitter feed of planting saplings in Colorado to offset the carbon footprint of the volunteer drivers. Or, we could have human powered rickshaws take the voters to the polls, hashtag #rickshawvotertransportforObama  Ooooh, trending higher now!

It’s almost down to a coin-flip, but we’ll call it Obama by the merest red hair of a margin.  America will be better for it, in the long run.