Category Archives: News and politics

The future went racing


The 24 Hours of Le Mans endurance race just ended.  Twenty-four hours of very fast racing on an eight mile circuit that weaves around the Loire.  On par with the Monaco Grand Prix, Indy 500 and the Paris-Dakar Rally, Le Mans is one of those races that sit at the top of the mountain.  Just about everyone has at least heard about Le Mans. 

The top two winning endurance racers were from Audi:  They build remarkable racing machines and quite wonderful street cars.  Externally, the winners looked sleek, powerful:  Low-slung, fat-tired, voluptuously curved, purpose-built weapons designed to violate the laws of aerodynamics, velocity, gravity and common-sense.  They are racing cars.  Brutes.  These two from Audi were very different under the skin. 

They are powered by Diesel engines.  Turbo-Diesel racing cars that pulled close to 300 kilometers per hour on the Mulsanne straight.  Turbo-Diesel racing cars that would pull nearly 2 G of lateral force in corners.  Turbo-Diesel racing cars that run on oil, not gasoline, or alcohol, or exotic fuels created by mad scientists. 

Audi winning Le Mans overall, with a Diesel, is the moral equivalent of winning the Tour de France on a unicycle, while drunk.   Then, nailing the Triple Crown on three-legged Shetland pony, hoisting the Stanley Cup with a team of eleven-year olds, and winning the Masters playing with an aluminum softball bat, a sod shovel and a snooker cue.

In the rest of the world, the Diesel engine is the engine of choice for family cars.  The reason the rest of the planet likes Diesels is simple:  The fuel costs a lot less and the engines will last, almost forever, with the usual maintenance.  Fuel economy is much better than gasoline and the pulling ability (torque) of the Diesel is huge. 

In North America, we relegate the Diesel to trucks, transports and heavy equipment because of their pulling power and their fuel economy.  There are the occasional eco-oddballs who run their personal diesel car on a mixture of recycled safflower oil, rendered goat grease and cat urine.  Diesels will burn just about anything in a pinch.

The Audi TDI’s proved that you can have a blindingly fast, reliable and proven Diesel engine that will out-perform the world’s best endurance racers.  This is cool.

There are two drawbacks to the Diesel, to North American sensibilities.  One is the odd clopping sound they make.  We’re used to the bang-bang-bang of a gasoline engine.  There is the smoke that Diesels produce.  We’ve imbedded the image of a smoky truck or bus in our brains filling the air with choking clouds of foul-smelling soot. 

The next time you’re on a highway, look at the exhaust stacks of most tractor-trailer trucks.  Modern Diesels very rarely smoke, unless under a big load, like starting to move at the stoplight and then only for a moment.  With engine control computers, particulate traps and turbo-charging, the Diesel is quite clean, compared to a gasoline engine.  Diesels only smoke when there is something wrong with them, meaning someone is not doing the maintenance, or has modified the engine somehow.

Roll down the windows too.  You won’t hear the screaming of a cage of angry bears coming from the truck.  The noise you hear is from the tires or the airflow, not the engine, especially at cruising speeds on the highway.  I was passed by a truck last week on the 401 highway.  He was flogging the truck unmercifully, running more than 130 kms an hour with a full 53-foot load.  The loudest sound I heard through the open window on my car, was the rear set of tires whining on the pavement. 

You can buy a Diesel passenger car from some manufacturers here.  Notably, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen.  The Asian imports, who sell thousands of Diesels overseas, don’t send their full line of engine choices to North America.  Domestic manufacturers only make Diesels available on their truck lines. 

Why?  That is easy enough to answer.  Gas engines are cheaper to make.  Gasoline is dirt cheap here, by world standards.  The oil companies don’t like Diesel.

Modern fuels all start from crude oil feedstock.  Crude, depending on which one, is thick and dark like molasses or heavy brown corn syrup.  To fraction, or break down crude into component fluids, you boil it, under pressure, in a big tower called a cracking tower.  The higher up the tower you drain off the fluid, the different type of fuel you get.  I am truly simplifying here, but that is the process, more or less. 

Look at a cup of gasoline:  Sort of a watery feel and very aromatic, meaning it vaporizes quickly.  Pour out a cup of Diesel oil and it just sits there like tan coloured, thin, corn syrup and doesn’t smell much, meaning it isn’t as volatile as gasoline.

Then, as a comparison, pour out a cup of Coleman stove fuel, which is naptha, or white gas.  It is clear like water, light to the feel and seems to evaporate before your eyes.  Naptha is drained off almost at the top of the cracking tower.

Bunker Oil, which is even darker and nastier than Diesel, is for ship engines and big generators.  It is only about one step removed from the crude oil that comes out of the ground, with the obvious rocks, gravel and small animals filtered out.

Here’s the Rule of Thumb:  The thicker and darker the petroleum product, the less work it takes to refine, which means the less it costs to make, which means the less you can mark it up. This means the less profit you can make on the product. 

We now have two big industries, oil and automotive, who have, shall we call it, a vested interest in keeping North America away from Diesel power for their passenger cars, as long as they can keep dancing. 

Real Reporting


I’ve slagged the current crop of television reporters quite thoroughly in a previous post, because they deserve it.  In the interest of being fair and balanced (not the FOXNews Unfair and Truly Unbalanced) I’m going to explain what I mean by a good reporter.  I’ve done enough reporting and sat through my share of butt-numbing council meetings to find nothing at the end of four hours worth reporting, even to shut-ins.  I’ve done the cop beat and written my share of fuzz and wuz stories.  The cops (the fuzz) went on a call and the following people (the wuz) are dead.  I didn’t care for that kind of work.All reporting starts with Who, What, When, Where and Why.  You can do this yourself by reading a newspaper story and writing down on the paper where you see each W answered. Use a pen, a pencil, a Sharpie, or even a charcoal briquette if you want.  That is rudimental, essential reporting.A good reporter comes into work, scans the news services and reads a few newspapers to see, approximately, what is going on.  Then they sit and think for a bit.  Good reporters use a simple question:  Qui Bono?  Qui Bono translates from the Latin, more or less, as Who Profits?Look at the string of facts regarding a story and after the basics of Who, What, When, Where, Why, ask Qui Bono?  For some stories the Qui Bono answer is We Do, meaning, society at large.  Meth dealer taken into custody?  Good thing for the imperial We.  Not all stories have another story hidden down in the guts somewhere.  The same could be true with a two car collision at an intersection.  It could end with a recitation of the facts.  Take our construct of a two-car fender bender at an intersection.  Here are some story ideas:  Bad intersection design?  Drunk/Sleepy drivers?  Cellphones and cars?  Child Safety Seats?  Auto Repair Scams?  Healthcare letting the injured fall through the cracks?  Insurance companies nailing people with unholy rate increases?  Ambulance response times?  Does the Fire Department spend more time going to piddly fender benders than inspecting highrises for sprinklers and fire safety?  How much does it really cost to have two cops, four firefighters, and four ambulance attendants get to and service a simple fender bender?  Is there an environmental impact to car crashes, since all the radiator coolant and oil runs into the sewers and out to where?  What happens to those cars in the junkyard?  Are we really recycling as much as we like to think we are?As an aside, I wrote that list of story ideas in less than four minutes.  It isn’t very hard to do, even for a guy who has not graduated from a second-rate community college.  Some of the story ideas might even lead to a nice, juicy scandal at the end of it.The next step of Qui Bono is sourcing and fact checking.  For every fact, except some of the obvious ones, I want to see two sources, preferably independent sources.  I don’t need two sources to verify that the two cars hit at 2:14 pm at the corner of Bank street and Walkley road.  The police report is sufficient for date, time and location, even to the most jaundiced, black-helicopter cynic.  For most of the other stuff, I do want two, or more, sources.  Using our fender-bender story again, follow along:  If an auto bodyshop manager says they only use new, factory parts in repairing the cars involved, then I want to take the cars to another bodyshop and have it confirmed, or see the actual factory markings on the parts.  The reason I want to prove it is Qui Bono.  In our mythical story, the auto bodyshop could use counterfeit or generic parts to fix the cars involved, but bill the insurance companies for the more expensive factory parts and pocket the difference.  There is a profit motive for the bodyshop manager to mislead the reporter that can only be uncovered by checking the facts.  Now I’ve got a story.  How much does your car insurance cost?  How much of that cost is insurance repair fraud?  What is the industry doing to stop it?  What are the penalties for doing that kind of fiddle?  Why aren’t the penalties stronger?  And so on.This takes time and occasionally money.  Often there is no story to chase, but once in a while there is a story.  It takes some effort from the reporter and some willingness of the news outlet to do the chasing.It is much easier for news outlets to take the press release, rewrite it, then have the reporter do a stand-up, top and tail, in front of the House of Commons.  Edit in a clip of the MP from CPAC, our CSPAN.  Then, we need a clip from the Opposition, again from CPAC and some stock footage of whatever the story is about.  Wheat, immigrants, security, ocean rights, doesn’t matter, just a clip or two of generic things on the subject will do.We have now created a minute and a half television news story by rewriting a press release.  We have also successfully avoided doing any journalism, reporting, or thinking.Qui Bono now?  We, as consumers of news, do not profit from this.  The groups who do profit from substandard reporting are two.  First are the media outlets who don’t have to spend time and resources.  Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are profit-driven businesses, which is fine, but know that less cost is good for them.  Second are, those in positions of power who continue to steal from us, lie to us, or mislead us, knowing that reporters will not, cannot and have no clue how to look too closely.Now you know how to be a good journalist:  Ask Who, What, When, Where, Why, Qui Bono and find at least two sources for all the facts.  The next time you see a reporter, on or in any media, measure them against those simple standards.  Did they do their job as they should?  Too often they don’t, which means we have all kinds of information, but not a whole lot of news.  Know the difference.

Dan would Rather


The Philly Inquirer is a legit paper, unrelated to the National Enquirer, so this story has what could be called ‘truthiness’ to it.  Dan Rather is leaving at the end of the month after 44 years of working for the Columbia Broadcasting System.

 

Dan Rather is 74 and has been doing the news thing for longer than some of us have been alive.  The fact that he’s actually survived this long in television, is testament to something either creepy or very good.  Creepy, in that like Mike Wallace, there might be an oil portrait of Dan in an attic that is aging at an incredible rate. 

 

The reason Rather is heading somewhere else is slightly complex.  First was Memogate, the story on Dubya’s questionable National Guard service in the 70’s.  Seems someone didn’t do the fact checking and got caught in a complete fabrication.  As Rather was the Managing Editor, meaning the one at the top of the heap, it was up to him to double and triple check that there was more than one source for the allegations.  He didn’t and his ass went into the blades.  This does happen to reporters. 

 

It would seem that after that fiasco and his very public apology, the suits at CBS didn’t want him around anymore.  Rather was ‘older’ and didn’t appeal to the modern, hip audience that CBS wanted to attract.  Dan was benched.

 

The first time most people saw or heard of Dan Rather was as a reporter at the CBS affiliate in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963.  Yes, Dan goes back to the Kennedy assassination.  He covered the war in Vietnam, was instrumental in breaking the Watergate story wide open on television and was known as a reporter who would go anywhere, anytime, to get the story.  He would call a spade, a spade, or a thief, a thief, to their face and dare the subject to speak back. 

 

Richard Nixon called Rather a ‘cocksucker’ on the Watergate tapes.  Nixon also thought Henry Kissinger was a nice guy, so we can discount Nixon’s dislike of Dan Rather, as delusionary brain wobbling.  Rather was almost as good as Mike Wallace at the door-buster piece.  He’s storm in with a camera crew, jam the microphone under someone’s face and fire away, just letting film (or tape) roll, to show the subject squirm like a bug on a hotplate. 

 

Dan Rather interviewed kings, queens and heads of state, sometimes blowing rainbows up their ass, sometimes kicking ass and taking names.  His reporting from the Gulf Wars I and II, were solid, real, pieces of actual reporting, something sadly lacking in today’s pseudo-journalistic cloud of fear, uncertainty and doubt.  Even Walter Cronkite respected Dan Rather.  But CBS didn’t.

 

This is the bad part.  Look around the dial for actual reporters next week, preferably reporters who are under 40 years of age.

 

Anderson Cooper?  Please don’t make me laugh, my lips are chapped.  You can see the wires that hold him upright and move his mouth.  If Jim Henson had ever designed a reporter, then that’s what came out of the workshop. 

 

John Roberts?  I remember JR at City-TV doing “The New Music” on a set the size of my bedroom, playing videos from Dire Straits.  He’s got all the journalistic credibility of Billy Mays for OxyClean.

 

Shep Smith?  He’s got a good last name, but he works for FOXNews for heaven’s sake, which means he has as much to do with journalism, as I do with Economic policy in the Czech Republic. 

 

The rest of the heads are just that, talking heads.  I’m including Katie Couric, who might have journalistic chops, but has no hardcore reporter background that I can find.  She’s a superlative interviewer and will do much to make CBS Evening News vaguely watchable, but not quite enough for journalism.

 

TV reporters, to my standard are:  Cronkite, Rather, Peter Jennings, Matthew Halton, Adrienne Clarkson in her fifth estate days, Marty Seemungel, who broke the first Somalian famine stories internationally, Ed Bradley, Mike Wallace and occasionally Lou Dobbs. 

 

The rest are meat puppets.  For some of the current crop of ‘reporters’, if the prompter said “Oooga Booga Bweedelah Bweedelah…I wet my pants…We’re being attacked by spiny blue hedgehogs…Mommy didn’t love me…”, then that is what would come out of their mouths, with the appropriate intonation and mock-seriousness.  Preferrably the reporter will have one hand to their earpiece to give statements of mindless nonsense the correct gravitas.

New Orleans


New Orleans has decided to go ahead with some much needed repairs to their city proper.  The levee system is under the purview of the Army Corps of Engineers and rebuilding there has been running as fast as possible since the water was drained.  It is the other parts of New Orleans that are now up for fixing. 

Ray Nagin has been reelected handily, with a reasonable plurality.  Now the local government is going ahead with demolition of areas that are too far gone.  The city is calling in sweaty guys with heavy equipment and bad socialization skills to destroy everything left standing and cart away the rubble.

This is extreme, but with whole neighbourhoods rendered uninhabitable, restoration is not practical in many circumstances.  Pull it down and start over is heartbreaking, but does make sense.  There is too much damage to fix. 

For their first trick, the New Orleans city government and the federal Housing and Urban Development agency will bulldoze three or four big public housing projects.  Everyone has to leave now, take what few possessions they have and go someplace else. 

The replacement housing will take at least two years to build.  It will be ‘mixed use’ housing.  Mixed use means of 500 units, two might be allocated to poor folks, but only if they scream.  The rest will be gentrified, near-downtown, elegant housing for those who can afford the tab.

There are, as best I can tell, no plans to flatten whole swaths of the middle class and wealthy areas.  The well-off can afford to contribute to political campaigns, which means they might turn off the money if we forcibly relocate them and drive an eleven-ton Catepillar D-6 over the mouldy, smelly, overgrown, decrepit remains of their housing.

Scratch that; the well-off don’t have housing, they have homes.  Poor people have housing, which isn’t nearly as important as destroying someone’s home.  Since these are poor people being uprooted and Ray has his job back for a few years, the authorities can screw them over with impunity, which is exactly what they are going to do. 

In two years time, when the housing is ready for occupancy, the seven or eight thousand people who have been shoveled off, will have resettled in another city, or be so bereft of any kind of resources to protest, that things will just naturally progress without much fuss. 

Years ago in Ottawa, around 1960, we had an area near the Supreme Court, called LeBreton Flats.  It was a poor, rundown, blue collar neighbourhood.  The National Capital Commission owned the land and decided that a slum, housing four or five thousand people near the Parliament, was not a good thing for any number of reasons.  Primarily aesthetic but also because, well, Ottawa doesn’t, and shouldn’t, have poor people that you can see.  The NCC decided to raze it all.

The NCC promised to build new houses for the people they were going to displace and to their credit the NCC did.  A couple of hundred truly ugly townhouses went up to replace the nearly two thousand they were tearing down.  Notice the numbers weren’t the same?  Well, I guess some of the people here will just have to, oh, move somewhere else, preferably far, far, away.

The NCC then sat on the land for nearly thirty years, mowing the grass once a week and letting the occasional festival trample the lawn.  When Pope John Paul II visited Ottawa in the 80’s, they put the temporary stage on LeBreton Flats.  A couple of years ago they built the Canadian War Museum on a piece of the Flats.  There is a bus transitway that bisects the area and that is about it.  No housing.  No businesses.  No apartments.  No greengrocers.  No pubs.  No shoe stores.  Nothing was put back. 

The people who used to live there?  A lucky few got to move into the 1960’s vintage ready-made planned community next door.  If you look at the history of the Flats, the replacement housing they originally hoped to build, and got agreement to, was quite nice for its time.

What was actually built, due to unforeseen budget constraints that magically appeared, was a well-planned, readymade concrete ghetto.  The rest of the people who used to live in LeBreton Flats?  They scattered to the winds.

Will New Orleans try the same thing?  In a years’ time, when all the poor folks who used to live there are scattered all over the southern US, New Orleans will have to ‘study’ the land.  Then do an ‘environmental assessment’ and an ‘economic analysis’, followed by ‘public consultations’. 

I can even write the last chapter on public housing in New Orleans, specifically the areas that are going to be torn down.  Ready?  The city does not want to interfere with free enterprise.  We need the tax base to support our rebuilding process.  The land use must be market driven.  The magical government code word is, market driven, meaning bend over and grab your ankles.

The undertext to the people who used to live there?  Don’t come back.

Hurricanes Gone Wild!


The US General Accounting Office has conducted its first audit of the Federal Emergency Management Agency disbursements from Hurricane Katrina.  Their findings have included some fascinating accounting, um, feats. 

As you might remember, a few days after the wall to wall coverage of Katrina, FEMA was handing out debit cards, preloaded with cash, to the disaster victims.  The ostensible idea was sound:  Here’s some cash to cover immediate needs, since you’ve lost everything.  It would seem that ‘immediate needs’ for people are different. 

Champagne for one need.  Dom Perignon bought at a Hooters in San Antonio, to be specific.  For God’s sake, man, not at a Hooters.  They have no idea what temperature to serve it at and I sincerely doubt that they have the correct flutes for the proper enjoyment.  Then again, considering it was at Hooters, I also sincerely doubt it was a proper vintage year (1999) or was accompanied by a proper serving of Sevrugia Caviar.  Peasants!

There was some appreciation of the cinematic arts with the FEMA money.  Specifically, copies of that major film work, “Girls Gone Wild Part XIV”  It is important to recognize the cinematic oeuvre of the director, Snoop Dogg, that despite the scope of the disaster that Snoop Doggs’ standing as an auteur and cineaste must still be controversial and forward looking.  Or, they just wanted to see drunk college girls showing their tits.

The New Orleans Saints NFL club was also the recipient of season ticket holders preferring to use federal funds, instead of their own money, for five seats.

Naturally, the legal profession was represented well in the disclosures.  Divorce lawyer Mark Lipkin said he didn’t remember anyone using a FEMA debit card to pay legal fees, but the General Accounting Office had the paper.  Someone paid off $1,000 worth of their bill with FEMA bucks. 

There were the usual finagles.  Someone took off to Hawaii and billed FEMA for accommodation.  Another person went to Punta Cana in Puerto Rico on the federal dime.  Enterprising federal inmates managed to get their hands on the FEMA money too, usually listing a graveyard or a post office box as their destroyed dwelling, pleading for assistance.

It is not surprising that there were fiddles with the FEMA money.  Even the best-run program of funding has a percentage of skim or shrinkage in it:  That is just the way life is.  My only complaint was the sheer mundane tedium of the fraud.  Holiday trips, titty videos. booze and season tickets to a fourth rate football team? 

I want to see the kind of fraud that would make the General Accounting Office stand up and applaud your audacity, your verve and your relentless, single-minded devotion to milking the FEMA tit as dry as Phoenix in August. 

Remember, your audience is Congress and the Senate, where accepting free flights to exotic destinations and briefcases of cash from lobbyists and political action committees is considered part of their divine right of Kings.  Anyone can steal a few thousand bucks, but it takes a real patriot to steal millions.

The innocent victims of Hurricane Katrina showed no spunk, no imagination and no skill.  That is just un-American.  Show some fire, some gumption and some sense of style!  Be a real patriot and bill FEMA for millions of dollars.  Haliburton does.  Blackwater Security does.  Bechtel does.  They never wind up in front of the General Accounting Office, looking at 10 to 20 years for federal fraud.  But I bet the poor mook who bought a six pack with his FEMA cash gets 10 years in the can for his $4 fiddle.

The Morning Wally


When I get up in the morning, usually around 0600, one of the things I do is turn on the TV to catch some planet-wide news.  As the coffee brews I watch three or four channels:  CNN, The Weather Network, City-TV and CBC NewsWorld, also known as WallyWorld.  Over ten or fifteen minutes I get brought up to speed on the usual global nightmares as well as the local hidousness.  The coffee finishes, I get into the shower and the day begins.

We’ll use this construct as a way to explain how the various media outlets cover things.  Here’s the mythical story:  India blows up.  One big, smoking hole exists where 1 billion people used to live.  No reason, it just went foom, overnight. 

CNN, the Ted Network.  News hors d’ourvres.  Nothing too deep and everything with an American bent.  There might be 30 seconds of coverage.  “India is a smoking hole, one billion dead, but now, Miles O’Brien with live coverage of a man in Indiana with a cashew-shaped melanoma”.

City-TV is relentlessly local.  If India blew up, they’d do a live shot from an Indian restaurant downtown and have an Indo-Canadian youth league hockey team on as guests.  “How does it feel to take the ice as an Indo-Canadian kid knowing your whole country has been blown to bits?”

The Weather Network is what is called wheel programming tv.  Every few seconds the wheel advances and they cover whatever nonsense is indicated on the wheel.  “It is eight minutes after the hour and now we’ll show you the pollen forecast for Newfoundland and Nunavut.  Next, India blows up, then your local golf forecast.”

 FoxNews, unfortunately, we get up here:  “Karl Rove is a free man after the liberal Democrats realized that he was completely innocent.  Hear that Liberal Tax and Spend whiners?  Completely Innocent!  And a billion brown people blew up overseas somewhere.  Next Ann Coulter and more of her brilliant insights into the real reason the Democrats want to force your daughter to have an abortion…”

BBC World Service would do a creditable job, with live shots from the edge of the smoking hole, world reaction from leaders everywhere, including some you never knew existed, like the Prime Minister of Madagascar.  For the record, it is Jacques Sylla. 

Local commercial TV, aside from City-TV would be along the lines of “On Oprah, Women Who Fake Orgasms, on Dr. Phil, Men Who Fake Bowel Movements.  Then, Action News at Six with a fascinating story on the potential shortage of sari cloth and taxi drivers in the GTA since India blew up.”

My favourite, however, is CBC NewsWorld, or as it is known, WallyWorld.  The original aim was to have a 24-hour news operation for Canada, along the lines of the BBC World Service.  With budget cutbacks and the sheer lack of anything happening in Canada most of the time, WallyWorld is left to fill a 24 hour gaping news maw, fill being the operative word. 

 

This morning, with the NHL playoffs winding down, WallyWorld took eleven minutes to interview the guy who runs the concessions in the RBC Center in Durham, North Carolina.  Deeply probing questions flew like wheat stalks at harvest time:  “Which of the wigs is the most popular among the fans?  The red ones ma’am.  They seem to really like the rainbow ones too.  Do you sell many Edmonton Oilers’ shirts?  Not really ma’am.  May I please try on your most popular fan wig?  Sure.  Thank you.  Now back to the studio…”

 

Some mornings I just want to watch radio.

Note for our American readers:  RBC is the Royal Bank of Canada.  TD-Waterhouse Center is the Toronto Dominion Bank.  The other one you see down in the US are BMO and CIBC.  BMO is Bank of Montreal.  CIBC is the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.  We own your arena names.

Lighter Fare


RoadDave  Lighter Fare
There’s been too much heavy stuff going on, so I went looking for those headlines that make you grin, then shake your head.
 
Sperm Have Sense of Smell:  (Discovery.com) The Indiana University at Bloomington has proven that the Mister Wigglies know which way to the egg.  Sperm can smell the tiniest zillionth of a part per gazillion of hormone that means “Egg This Way, now swim!” 
 
But what about a head cold?  If what happens to the full-size human is indicative, then you’ll find sperm crashed out on the sofa, running down the batteries on the remote as they watch seven channels of bad afternoon TV, eating a jumbo size bag of Cheezies, then sleeping for six hours.   
 
Darryl Hannah Kicked Out Of Tree by Cops:  (From MSNBC.com) I know her career is in the dumper.  She’s fallen below the D-List of Danny Bonnaduce and Wink Martindale, but living in a tree?  On closer examination, it would seem she was protesting the razing of a park to build a warehouse in La-La-Land and had been camping in a tree to prevent it being cut down.  For a moment there I thought we had a really good celeb scandal brewing.
 
Coffee protects against Cirrhosis:  (newscientist.com) If you drink four cups of coffee a day, you have reduced your chance of getting alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver by 80 percent.  That’s Eighty percent better than someone who only drinks gin.  Unfortunately the researchers at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in Oakland, California, didn’t tell us what would happen if you drank rum in your coffee.  Would everything just cancel out?
 
Nova Scotia Conservatives Win Minority: (ctv.ca) Most Canadians didn’t even know there was an election scheduled in Nova Scotia.  For the US readers, Nova Scotia is that sort of bow-tie shaped thing on the map, up beyond Boston.  It’s a part of Canada, a whole province, actually. 
 
Nova Scotia has been missing for two years and was seen frequently on the side of milk cartons, public service billboards and the back of utility bills.  (Have you seen this province?  Call 1-800-Fed Govt now!)
 
Judging by the photo of Rodney MacDonald, the good citizens have elected an 11-year old as Premier.  His platform consisted of raising the minimum allowance to $5.00 a week and not having fish in the school cafeteria on Fridays. 
 
Some days it just pays to read.

The Pictures and The Report


Reactions to the pictures of Bidet and Qtip Hussein’s bodies have bee predictable. They are grisly, hideous and authoritative. The two Sons of Saddam are quite dead. The moral justification of all this is a little dodgy, but I can live with the grey areas and inconsistencies. Had there been a chance to drag the bodies through the streets of Mosul, the Iraqi populace would have obliged, providing graphic evidence that there has been a regime change that even an uneducated goat herder could comprehend.

In certain cultures, even ours, this kind of evidence is important. Do remember that Saddam and the Sons terrorized their population for nearly 30 years. We’re talking a whole generation brought up under a leader with absolute power who let his sons behave like Caligula without the restraint and politeness.

There will always be a percentage that will never believe any evidence. It’s too easy to blame the Evil Empire of America, so why confront simple realities when massive conspiracy theories are much more entertaining. This also explains Area 51, Black Helicopters and the International Monetary Fund. By the way, if you don’t go along with the conspiracy theorists, then you’ve obviously been co-opted by the Force, so prepare yourself for that bit of intellectual salsa dancing while you’re up.

The Report is more troubling. It is the Congressional Report on 9/11. The arc of the questions were simple: What the hell went wrong? Why didn’t we catch this shit before it happened?

The fact that 9/11 happened is just the tip of the spear. Intelligence departments didn’t or couldn’t connect the dots enough to figure out something was up before it happened. Fair enough. We, meaning the intelligence agencies and governments, knew that Al Qaeda and a basket of other terrorists groups didn’t like the US before 9/11, I think even the IRA was listed as a terrorist group that didn’t like the US and I don’t remember their being a ban on all Irish people coming to the US, pre-9/11.

What we couldn’t know up until the moment, was that Bin Laden had enough loopy followers, determined to carry out the attacks on the US. The rest of the report is just the benefit of hindsight. To use the nebulous rules of hindsight, I should have never gone into radio in 1976, because I should have known that AM radio was doomed by FM and local television was soon to follow, led by the Internet. Meanwhile my career choice in technology is flawed because all the high tech jobs are going offshore. According to the Rules of Hindsight I should have known this in 1972.

I suppose my very first choice of being a liquor, mattress and condom tester would have been better. Again using the benefit of perfect hindsight it would have been a great career, except I’d now have cirrhosis, back problems and have worn the end off of Mr. Johnson.

The Report is a few thousand pages of Monday Morning Quarterbacking that merely proves the authors can predict the past. Yes, there were security lapses. Yes, the various intelligence agencies didn’t really share well. Yes, there were emergency response problems. Yes, all those problems have been studied; we learned big lessons, really quickly and fixed them even faster.

Some might say we over-compensated, but considering the remarkable depth and breadth of infrastructure change we initiated and implemented in a very short period of time, I’d say we did fine. Fortunately, the finger pointing from the Congressional Report has been shouldered off the media by the pictures of the Sons of Saddam.  The media always loves a good blood and guts show.

Which answers the real question: Why do television stations cover shootings, police chases, hostage takings and the rest of modern hostility with very expensive remote satellite camera units, helicopters and massed coverage? Simple: The first one on the screen with the blood and guts wins the ratings wars. Show me the widow’s tears, or the victim’s wounds, or show me the shooter being dropped by SWAT. Live.

Not a whole lot different from dragging a body through the streets, except we let TV cover it for us in North America, so we don’t dirty our hands behaving like the savages we really are.

Driving


An 86 year old man, Russell Weller, who ploughed his car through a Santa Monica farmer’s market, is in the news and not in a good way. The facts of the story are simple enough; the car Weller was driving took off down a closed street, killing 10 people who were at the market. Police have hinted that Weller had mistaken the gas pedal for the brake pedal. The police have impounded his car to test for mechanical problems and even checked his home for any drugs that could have caused impairment. Charges may be pending.

Simple enough for us to judge: Geezer at the wheel, blood pressure medicine, a lightheaded spell and bodies flying every which way as a result. Well, it is not always that clear. For those with long memories, they will recall the Audi Unintentional Acceleration ruckus in the early 80’s.

The bones of the Audi story were somewhat related. Audi Quattro cars with automatic transmissions would suddenly accelerate at full throttle when the owners started them, even though the owners swore on a stack of Bibles they were standing on the brake pedal. One notable incident saw a Quattro shoot through the back of a garage and land in the swimming pool.

Both stories bring up the issue of man-machine interface. If you drive an automatic transmission car built in the last few years you notice that you cannot shift from Park unless your foot is firmly on the brake pedal. This little safety gem is courtesy of the Audi Quattro.

Car and Driver magazine did extensive testing of the Quattro back then and could not under any circumstances, get the car to overpower its brakes, as long as the driver had their foot on the brake pedal. Even with the engine at wide open throttle and forcing the transmission into gear, as long as the brakes were on, the Quattro just stalled dead or did a brake stand and spluttered.

Did Russell Weller have his foot on the brake of his Buick when he went whistling through the farmer’s market? Obviously not; it had to be on the gas. Did Russell Weller mistake the gas for the brake? Most likely. Now, we have a question we can work with. Why?

We take driving for granted. We get in the machine, turn the key, grab a gear and go. From placing your butt in the seat to rolling down the driveway is usually a five-second process. Perhaps we take an extra second to adjust the mirror if someone else has been driving the car, but five seconds is about it.

Some of this is muscle memory: We “know” where the pedals, shifter and radio controls are because we have done it so many times in our car. There is the real problem. We don’t consciously make the motions to the brake, gas, clutch, lights, turn signals and four ways every time we get in the car, checking visually to see if we’re right. Our Brain assumes the leg muscle knows how to get to the brake if the brain says “kid in road chasing ball, apply brakes hard, now”. If that muscle memory is off, by an inch or two, you either miss the brake, or hit the gas pedal. Which puts us in Russell Weller Land and on the News in a context that is less than favourable.

Is there an answer to this? Part of the answer is called Recurrent Testing. To my mind you should re-test for your Driver’s License every five years: Eye exam, written test, driving test. This should help to weed out, or retrain the truly stupid, ignorant, careless or medically unfit. Aviation has been doing this for years and it is proven to work.

Since the Wright Brothers days, scientists have examined how humans and machines interact with repetitive tasking that contains an element of risk. The body of knowledge is extensive from aviation and even railroads. Very little of it has been applied to cars and trucks.

As an example, if you look at a small airplane cockpit, you’ll notice something. There are very few switch handles alike so the pilot can recognize the function of the switch by feel without breaking his gaze out the window. Some controls are action positive, meaning you must consciously put the control in a position to perform its operation by opening a guard or moving a lever from a detent or gate. You can’t accidentally knock the control into operation.

Air brakes on a truck are another example, based on railroad technology. The default is brakes fully on. Only when air pressure at a predetermined level is present do the brakes release. Any cut in the line or loss of air pressure and the brakes go back to fully on.

Cars are exactly opposite. Default is brakes off. Controls, like a turn signal, can be easily moved with a shirt sleeve. High beam headlights are a toggle, once to turn on, once again to turn off. Pedals are in different positions in different models of cars, with different pedal spacing.

If we did apply some consistency of placement and operation of key controls to cars would we eliminate driver error? Nothing works 100 percent, but this won’t hurt. Will recurrent testing eliminate driver error? No, but this won’t hurt either. Better driver training to start with? Also a good thing.

The prevention of another Russell Weller is a combination of changes based on knowledge we already have from aviation, railroads and pure science. All it takes is some societal will and some intelligence.

So Predictable


The US Democrats are all a twitter because George W Bush mislead the everyone with the claim that Saddam Hussein was getting his mitts on nuclear weapons bits. And, of course, those on either end of the spectrum are finger pointing, shooting off their mouths and calling for resignations, investigations, assassinations and various forms of public humiliations.

In perspective, those in the big chairs rely on a stadium full of advisors to give them information. Reality dictates that Colin, George, Dick and Condoleezza can’t spend the afternoon at the Public Library doing their homework on Iraq, or Liberia, or International Terrorists. They get briefings from those who are given the job of “find out about topic X”. The briefers don’t actually do the work; they have staffs who do the grunt work. Some ink-stained wretch who actually surfs up the data is never allowed near the Big Chairs, of course, as this would be unseemly for an actual researcher to be in the same building as the final consumer of the information.

Naturally, the raw data is compressed, cleaned up, checked for spelling and coffee rings on the paper. Then, the information is either rewritten for the final consumer, or run through four or five other computers to “make sure we make a good impression on the President.”  Suffice to say, pushing a simple declarative sentence through this many sets of eyes and meddling fingers, results in paragraphs of bureaucrat-speak containing as little information as possible.

The issue is simple enough. Colin, George, Dick, Condoleezza and the rest of the Big Chair gang get their data. But the data has been groomed for “appearances”, “style” and “readability”. Would less-than scrupulous briefers fiddle the data to jiggle a conclusion? Nobody wants to piss on the Presidential Parade, so would data that does not support the general idea be suppressed, edited out, footnoted, reworded or generally marginalized? Well, yes. That’s like predicting gravity works.

The Big Chair folks rely on the briefers and the quality of the information to make informed decisions. Go or No-Go? WMD or just an Asshole? Rainy or Sunny? Whole Wheat or White? The problem comes when the Big Chair folks have to make the call. If the only data you have says it is raining, will rain, is continuing to rain and should rain right through to next Thursday, you make sure you take an umbrella. Or, just for the hell of it, turn on the Weather Channel, or take a peek out the window and look for yourself.

None of the occupants of those Big Chairs strike me as complete fools who rely solely on the information they get from their people, but the ultimate responsibility does rest at the feet of the Big Chairs. In the past, the only proper response to being manipulated by your data and (hopefully inadvertently) lying to the public would be to resign. That would entail being honourable and responsible and behaving with some character, so we know that dog won’t hunt.

The finger pointing will go on. Colin, George, Dick and Condoleezza will take some serious heat, but not near as much heat at their respective staffs. In a month or two, one lowly scribe will get fired, being blamed for the information grooming, while the stuffed suits between the real data and the Big Chairs will keep on working. Big surprise again.

That is the real issue, Leadership Isolation. All the assistants, special assistants, assistant special assistants and liaison folks who groom information are the ones who should be in deep trouble. Leaders must fight being in a bubble all the time. Leaders have to trust the people around them to give them good information, even if the information is totally contrary to the general line of thought.

Quite a few families are now mourning the deaths of their sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, husbands and wives. All because of stuffed suit briefers and leaders who wouldn’t look out the window to see if it was really raining.