Post-Colorado and post-Toronto shootups, there is increasing talk of gun control on both side of the border. We’ll define our terms here, as this is the best way to limit knee-jerk reaction to the whole issue, which understandably, many people take too seriously. We will also provide translation where needed, as we recognize that some people are familiar with firearms and some are not.
First off, it isn’t a gun. A gun is defined as a projectile weapon using a hollow tubular barrel with a closed end as the means of directing a projectile. This could be anything from a 16-inch gun on a battleship that sends shells the size of your sofa towards a target forty miles away, to a marshmallow gun that shoots Kraft Miniatures at a square of chocolate and two graham crackers using air pressure. They’re all guns.
We’re talking about, specifically, firearm weapons. True, knives, swords, crossbows and clubs are also weapons. A stapler can be a “weapon” as it all depends on intent, which we will get to shortly.
A “rifle” refers to the spiral grooves, the rifling, machined inside the barrel of a firearm to make the bullet spin and be more accurate over distance. A “shotgun” refers to the type of projectile, several dozen little steel or lead balls, called shot, in a largish shell, about the size of a lipstick, for those of our audience who use makeup on a regular basis.
A handgun or pistol is a common term that describes the size of the weapon, generally meaning small enough to hold and use with one hand. A shotgun a handgun and a rifle are all firearm weapons, meaning they use gunpowder to propel some kind of hard projectile at high speed towards something else.
We will define further demarcations between long firearm weapons and short firearm weapons.
Hunting firearms are almost all, by definition, long weapons, meaning more than 18 inches long and rarely with a clip of more than 8 rounds.
We’ve got no problem with hunting, be it ducks, moose or even sporting clays, but frankly, sporting clays taste horrible, even if you cook them for a week. Pass a firearms safety course, keep them in a firearms safe at home and transport them properly. Feel free to break bottles, control varmints or target shoot to your wallet and heart’s content. All we ask is that if you do take an animal or four that you use as much of the animal as you can, be it deer, elk, bear or ducks. How many and in what season is up to the provincial or state hunting regulations.
The only limitation we would ever consider imposing is to limit the weapon to semi-auto and to eight rounds. For the non-firearms folks semi-auto means you have to pull the trigger each time you want to fire the weapon and you have to reload after eight shots. Reloading takes a couple of seconds with a well-skilled person using the weapon.
Where the problem exists is firearm weapons that are less than 18 inches long and that great mystery of intent.
We don’t have a problem with people who target shoot using handguns, which are by definition less than 18 inches long. One of our acquaintances is Linda Thom. She knows how to use a weapon correctly, safely and with exceptional precision, as evidenced by her 1984 Olympic Gold Medal in 25 metre sport pistol competition. If you want to shoot targets with a firearm weapon less than 18 inches long, the same rules for long firearm weapons would apply: Firearms safety course, weapons safe at home, proper transportation, limit to semi-auto and eight rounds. The only addition would be a very stringent police background check and here’s why:
Firearm weapons shorter than 18 inches can be easily concealed.
A concealed firearm weapon has a different potential intent than one that is very difficult to conceal, like a long firearm weapon. Yes, you can still pull a Model 870 out from under your coat and fire away at things and people, but it’s a lot harder to conceal than a M1911 short firearm weapon. Both firearms can be used for benign purposes, be it hunting, or target shooting, but both can also be used to kill people. This speaks to intent and the intent to conceal means you have the potential for less than socially acceptable ends in mind when you pull out a short firearm.
Since we can’t actually determine intent up front when someone goes to buy a firearm (Gosh, I don’t want to hurt ducks, I want to shoot several co-workers and then die in a hail of bullets from the ERT – is rarely written on a Firearms Acquisition Certificate as the reason they want to obtain a weapon) we have to make it difficult for less than lawful and socially acceptable uses of firearm weapons.
Concealment is the first step: Make it hard to conceal the weapon by making it illegal for the firearm weapon, except for very specific circumstances, to be less than 18 inches long.
Second step is a limit of semi-auto and eight rounds. Hunters and target shooters don’t need to be able to fire a clip in one pull. If you’re that unskilled that you need full auto and a 50 round clip to take a deer, we’re not sure you should be allowed to have a camera, let alone a firearm. Make it illegal for the firearm weapon to fire full auto and to have a capacity of no more than 8 rounds per magazine or clip.
Third step: The display or involvement of any firearm weapon in the commission of any crime results in the automatic doubling of the penalty. Discharge of a firearm weapon in the commission of any crime results in a second doubling of the penalty. We call it the Double-Double Rule, named after the Tim Horton’s Coffee typical order of a Double-Double, of two cream and two sugar.
Here’s the elegance of the Double-Double: It speaks to the intent of the use of the firearm weapon. It has nothing to do with the legal, acceptable use of firearm weapons, aside from some sensible limits (semi-auto, no more than 8 rounds) their safe use, transportation and storage. These laws are already on the books, or could be amended very easily. Double-Double has everything to do with the commission of illegal acts involving firearm weapons.
So let’s take the Toronto shootings: Illegal possession of a firearm weapon of less than 18 inches in length. Seven and a half years is one of the more recent sentences. Double it, is 15. Discharge of the weapon with intent to harm another person, double it again: 30 years. We’ll let you in on a little feature of Double-Double. No parole or time off for good behaviour: You serve the full 30 year sentence under Double-Double even if it is your first offence.
Perhaps the beauty of the whole arrangement is we don’t have to argue about ‘banning guns’ a gun registry, stolen and illegal handguns, or even debate the merits of target shooting and hunting by sensible, safe, firearm weapons owners. Double-Double gets to heart of the matter, the intent of the firearm weapon holder, without changing our current situation very much.
Could a Double-Double law have prevented the Colorado shooter James Holmes or the Norwegian nutcase Anders Brevik? Not really, except that the shooters would have less likely access to short firearm weapons, either legally, or illegally and know the penalty for being taken alive would be a very, very long time in prison. We can’t control the crazy, no matter how hard we try to legislate things: There will always be those who find a way to act on the voices in their head.
But we can make it very, very punitive for gang-bangers and their ilk to cross that line of intent. A few of them being put away for 30 years tends to send the message in a clear, concise and easily understood manner: Do not use a firearm weapon in the commission of an illegal act – You will go to jail for a long, long time.
Where’s the upside of Double-Double, you ask? For one, it keeps our politicians from behaving in knee-jerk fashion nattering on about ‘gun’ control to gather votes. One Toronto mayor wanted to make target shooting ranges illegal to stem the flow of stolen handguns from the US. That’s almost as dumb as clear cutting forests because forests have trees, that are made of wood, than can be made into a baseball bats that can be used to hit other people over the head.
The second upside is that we make it difficult enough already to legally have a firearm weapon less than 18 inches in length. If you are that keen to take up target shooting and the pistol arts, then you won’t mind waiting 30 days or more for the background check to be completed while you take your firearms safety course and get your firearms safe installed. No problem, as your intent is socially acceptable and the laws are already on the books. Do recognize that we will put your ass in a sling if we find you’re storing your firearms in a dresser drawer with two full mags and the safety off. That’s stupid beyond belief and has nothing to do with target shooting.
Third, we’re not limiting long firearm weapons, aside from the aforementioned semi-auto and eight round limits. Hunt, shoot clays, control varmints or plink bottles all day if you want to, as long as you do it safely. If we find you piss drunk shooting a stop sign by the side of the highway, be assured the cops will confiscate your weapon and should probably give you two black eyes with the butt of your shotgun for being a complete idiot out of season.
Fourth, we get rid of those who choose to wave a gun around, either as thieves, robbers or gang-bangers by putting them away for a very long time. It might take a few years for the message to be delivered, but at least the perpetrators will be off the street. It took about ten years to get the message regarding seat belts or driving drunk to become mainstream, so it isn’t an instant fix. Nothing is.
As for the crazies like James Holmes? That we cannot fix.
Dammit, I’m sick of all these calls for more laws regarding gun control! You only need ONE law – use BOTH hands! 😀
I DO need to argue with your mag limit – I say 10 rounds Otherwise, you make both of my Lee-Enfields illegal, as they hold 10 rounds. Unless you give a special exception to bolt-action rifles, which require a certain talent and intelligence to work – thus making them HIGHLY unlikely in mass shootings. 😉
I’d also argue for a limit on how much ammo you can get at one time period. After all, even on a heavy re-enacting weekend, I rarely burned through more than 300-400 rounds (blanks, granted), and I was just making noise for noise’s sake. Six THOUSAND rounds? Savings in quantity, okay, but just like the warehouse clubs, do you REALLY need 500 gallons of mayonnaise?!?
Although my biggest gripe is, why are we not talking about the body armour? Yeah, you can probably get flak vests online through eBay, but Kevlar groin protectors and leggings? A mil-spec Kevlar helmet? The purchases of THOSE things should’ve set alarms off all the way back to Washington, DC! I mean, I could assemble a fairly bullet-resistant outfit out of military surplus and medieval chain mail with leather, but it’s gonna weigh a TON and cost me dearly. Which raises a second gripe about this guy’s gear – how the heck was a guy, working at McDonalds, affording all this firepower and armour?
Unfortunately, I doubt much is gonna happen, this being an election year here in the land of the eternal campaign. Maybe November will bring some action – but I’m willing to bet the only action will be the continued massive increase in gun registrations in Aurora, Colorado, and (to a lesser degree) across the States.
I’ll keep my Webley revolvers loaded and my swords by the door, just in case.
You might have a prayer in Canada or Alasha, but not in the USA
John and Tom: Thanks for your comments. We’ll address them jointly. I can go along with having a ten round limit on clip. What we don’t need is fifty round magazines: Those only belong on full-auto firearm weapons to kill many people with and we specifically preclude full-auto firearm weapons for anyone but the police and the military. Those folks are trained to use them appropriately and correctly in the right context.
Notice that Double-Double has nothing to do with the so called Right To Bear Arms. You can have as many firearm weapons as you want as long as you are trained to handle and transport them safely and store them safely, subject to the semi-auto, 8 (now 10) round limit on a mag. You can have as many mags as you want to carry.
The right to be safe in person, papers and property does not give you the right to conceal carry a full-auto Ingrahm MAC-10 with two dozen 50-round magazines for ‘self-defense’. Who are you defending yourself from? The Israeli Army? It doesn’t pass the reasonableness test that is at the cornerstone of any law on either side of the border.
As for the ready availability of mil-spec body armor? That’s a state problem. Our consideration is that unless you are in the military, a cop or a security guard, you can’t have it because the presumed intent is the same as the use of a firearm weapon. The penalties should be the same as if you were caught with an illegal full-auto firearm weapon in your possession.
There is no reason a law-abiding citizen should have body armor, unless they are in the immediate process of becoming a not-so law abiding citizen. No, being a Neighbourhood Watch block captain does not entitle you to a full kit of body armor. Call the cops, as they have the training, abilities and legal right to use the appropriate amount of force to end a violent situation. You don’t.
And if your ‘business’ routinely forces you to go to areas where there is an apprehension of imminent danger from firearms, then you should consider a different line of work. We banned asbestos and BPA in baby bottles, so we can ban body armor just as easily.
Well, Davey, I just MIGHT give into your socialist rights-stomping campaign re the body armour and big mags, but you are forgetting one vitally important thing – what about the zombie apocalypse? 😉
Seriously, I can fully buy into both the mags and the body armour concepts. As to gun size, 18″ is an awful lot for a pistol, especially a home defence unit. There’s a lot of six-guns .38 cal and smaller that are below that, as there also are semi-autos. Plus, the dirt-common 9×18 Parabellum guns tend to carry 10-15 rounds (Beretta 92F as my benchmark). What I could see is permitting up to 15 rounds up to something like .40cal/10 mm (a unique crossover point), 8-10 rounds over that, and (especially) adding some gimmick that would actually slow magazine changes. Yes, that part could be removed, but knowledgeable people don’t tend to go on rampages, and nutcases tend to be barely able to work their weapons (the Aurora shooter’s AR-15 jammed, and he simply dropped it).
Alternately, we take away all guns and give out swords. No jams, no mags, and (unless you are EXTREMELY talented) no more drive bys. 😉
Speaking of which – what goes “clip-clop clip-clop clip-clop BANG BANG BANG clip-clop clip-clop”? An Amish drive-by. 😀
(Sorry, I absolutely HATE ending on a “heavy” topic.)