On Friday it came out that the US Federal Government has been monitoring financial transactions with the same zeal as they have been monitoring email and phone calls. The database that the Department of JustUs (Their motto: “It’s Just Us”) tapped into is called SWIFT or the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Transactions.
SWIFT is the clearinghouse for, as the name states, the electronic moving of money from A to B. They handle about 11 million messages a day. Not the actual transfer, but the details about the transaction. From whom and what account, how much and to whom into what account, in what currency, at what time. It is essentially the log of the bank transactions.
The idea, post 9/11 was to track the cash to and from Al Qaeda, identify the various cells and put names to the cement heads involved. The Department of JustUs didn’t want this to be commonly known. Part of surveillance is to not let those who are being watched, to know that they are being watched, so you can see who plays with them, supports them and the various goings on. I can buy into some secrecy on a limited basis.
We know that the US Feds have been spying on domestic citizens’ phone calls, emails and financial records for several years, without warrants, as part of the Patriot Act and a couple of Executive Orders. This, of course, is contrary to Amendment IV, ratified December 15, 1791, of the US Constitution, which reads thusly:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Incidentally, the lads who put this little gem into the US Constitution had just come through a war they eventually won. The British would routinely intercept mail, bust down doors, terrorize families, cart off the husbands under various ‘charges’, burn down barns, pay informants to eavesdrop and do everything in their power to crush the Rebellion as it was an issue of Colonial Security.
What the DoJ is doing is data mining. The data piles into a big database, Rob Scrimger can comment on how to do it. Next, a clever bit-head writes a stored procedure to ask the following questions: Find me all the bank transactions from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Yemen, Qatar and Afghanistan to the US, or to an intermediate country that winds up in the US.
Then, of that group, find me all the transactions that are less than $10,000 in value. Ten thou is the threshold that all US banks must report, by law, to get around money laundering. A good financier of cement heads would make sure that the transaction won’t set off the RICO trigger for compulsory reporting.
Now, find any transaction that is readily divisible by 2, 5 or 10 and throw them out. This is the Rule of Expense Account Padding. If you put in for $300 worth of expenses, all the auditor bells go off, but $309.43 must be true, as it is too strange a number to be anything but legit. Nobody with a brainstem would transfer a round number to a cement head. But just to be sure, check where the transactions came from. If the transaction is from an individual, not a bank, flag it for me, even if it is divisible by 2, 5, or 10.
Last step: Print out all the transactions left over. Show me the names, addresses and account information with that transfer: Turn the list over to the G-Men with simple orders: Watch these people closely and cross names off the list as we go.
Invariably you will find the vast majority of transactions are benign: Tuition payments, bills, lending cash to a relative, charitable donations and such. Odds are most individuals do this once a month, or only a few times a year. Banks shoot big numbers back and forth, hourly.
This is data mining at its simplest. It is what the DoJ is doing with the SWIFT data. Add in a list of phone calls to and from known cement heads and email to and from cement heads, all gong to the same address then you have what would be described as a person of interest.
Was the test of no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized fulfilled? Ummmm.
Today, Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., said he would write Attorney General Alberto Gonzales urging that the nation’s chief law enforcer "begin an investigation and prosecution of The New York Times _ the reporters, the editors and the publisher."
"We’re at war, and for the Times to release information about secret operations and methods is treasonous," King told The Associated Press.
This is called trying to muzzle the media to get them to stop looking too closely at what the government is doing. I shouldn’t have to quote the First Amendment, but I will:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
In 1972 Richard Nixon and the Committee to Re-Elect the President used the IRS and the FBI to put the screws to publishers, activists and enemies with either overt actions, or the threats of actions to muzzle dissent and force the media to not look too closely.
The Washington Post ignored the pliers to the scrotum approach and brought us Watergate: A sitting President, Richard Nixon, resigned in disgrace two years after winning the biggest plurality in Presidential election history. America was appalled beyond belief at what went on.
So, back to the title: Uppity Canadian. Why is an uppity Canadian explaining this stuff to a partially American audience? I have a hidden agenda I’m going to tell you about.
In Canada we‘ve elected a Dubya jock-sniffer and Cheney-wannabe called Steven Harper. Harper is watching what Dubya is getting away with. He’s going to try to get some of that. I don’t want a government microphone in my apartment.
Judging by the media coverage, the American public does not care that their cherished rights as enshrined in their Constitution are being eaten whole by a government and a President who have repeatedly proven that they cannot be trusted to make photocopies, let alone respect important rights.
If I can remind you folks south of the 49th about your constitutional rights, you might do something about it. If your media grows a set and starts to poke into the really illegal, really stinky things your government is doing, then I can benefit.
The outrages being done today make the Watergate heinousness look like a five year old pinching a Dubble-Bubble at the supermarket. This isn’t stain-on-a-dress impeachability. We’re talking stuff even a grade four student in a US public school can see is truly wrong.
Our government will see Dubya and his cronies get tossed out on Blue Box day at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Then Steven Harper will back down and take his brownshirt bund back to the Tar Sands where they belong.
See? I told you I had an agenda.