When you have downtime between cities, sometimes there is just nothing to do, but watch TV. OK, I have been known as a news junkie: Always have been and it stems back to radio days when we had a Broadcast News and Canadian Press feed into the newsroom. You were always plugged in, hard, to the first draft of history. And I haven’t shaken it, really, since.
On the various news shows, there is constant coverage of the David Westerfield trial and sentencing phase. He’s the monster who stole a kid from his neighbour’s house in the night, raped her repeatedly and killed her, burying the body in the woods. Well-meaning folks on either end of the political spectrum are now arguing capital punishment for Westerfield. You can predict who is on which side of the argument, as easily as you can predict the Star Trek crewman in the red shirt will die before the first title credit.
My answer is easy. Do Not Debate Capital Punishment. Its a zero-sum game. So, rather than debate Capital Punishment and all that entails, I just want Justice. Which is significantly different from Capital Punishment or Guilt or Innocence.
To that end, my solution. Convicted of a major crime? General Population for you. Prisons are a microcosm of society, with right and left wing people. Prisoners will decide for us. If killing a police or peace officer is not considered bad by their society, then you live. If raping and killing an eight year old is considered bad by their society, then they’ll decide on the punishment.
The neat part of the argument is: We don’t argue about it.
A jury of the bad guys’ peers argues about it and carries out the sentence. Our hands are clean. Their hands, arguably already dirty, mete out the appropriate punishment in a more creative way than our society can and without endless legal manoeuvring.